Which Magnesium is better?

Which Magnesium is better?

I should hope by now that from previous blogs and product information that you all know what Magnesium is… But do you know the difference between the Magnesium compounds available?

There are quite a few variants of Magnesium out there but they do not all work in the same way. Each form comes with it’s own potency, viability and purpose as well as side effects. So it’s important for consumers to know which is which and what is what!!

  • Magnesium Lactate &
    Magnesium Malate &
    Magnesium Citrate &
    Magnesium Glycinate – Are found as common additives in supplements to certain percentages depending on which supplement you buy and for what purpose. These would have little to no impact for transdermal relief so don’t bother adding your Whey protein shake mix to the bath, this is not the Wonka factory!!

  • Magnesium Oxide & Magnesium Taurate- These 2 are used for specific purposes such as treatment for chronic disease or illness and symptoms management for conditions that cause high blood pressure, heart burn, digestive issues and constipation. Not typically for external use an should never be taken orally without guidance and monitoring by medical practitioners.

  • Magnesium Chloride & Magnesium Sulfate- Both widely used for topical application and both effective in assisting muscle and joint pain. Magnesium Chloride ‘melts’ a lot faster meaning the skin can absorb it quicker and it can then be transported to soft tissue for fast relief. Magnesium Sulfate is as we all know the famous Epsom Salt remedy for relaxation, muscle and joint relief and a family favourite amongst many Aussies. Both effective and both favourable but still a difference between them both.

 Let's break down the main points

  • Magnesium Chloride is highly soluble in water, not only does it dissolve almost immediately regardless of the water temperature but the solution is drawn inward and helps balance other minerals during absorption. 

  • Epsom salt doesn't hydrate the skin as well as Magnesium Chloride, which would defeat the purpose of the Slay Skin Care principals 

  • Magnesium Chloride is much safer for the skin in general as there is lower risk of skin toxicity which makes it perfect for use in topical creams and sprays. 

  • Magnesium Chloride protects the skin surface and doesn't strip any of the natural oils away which means there is less risk of irritation and can be applied directly- Epsom has low risk too but can leave a dry texture and film on the skin when applied directly especially in the form of a spray. 

  • Magnesium Chloride doesn't overload the kidneys for excretion, due to the bioavailability it is absorbed until levels are satisfied and then the excess is filtered out with little to no disruption internally

  • The chemical compound of Magnesium Chloride is more natural than Epsom and therefore when it is introduced into the body it is less likely to interrupt the natural processes and immunity making its way into the skin, hair, muscles and joints with a warm welcome; rather than with the potential of being an uninvited guest that we must now accommodate at the dinner table. 
    You like that metaphor? 

It is also important to mention that anyone deficient in Magnesium should not rely on transdermal applications alone to 'top up' their levels. Using our product such as Rem & Recover will introduce an amount of the mineral (ours includes sodium too unlike other brands) BUT sprays and creams will never give you the total required amount for synchronicity within the muscle's, joints, nerves and organ function. You must introduce these minerals in various forms such as diet and supplements but should only do this when you have had blood tests and GP and even a dietician oversee your unique needs.

No 2 bodies are the same and regardless of the textbook suggestions, you will need a tailored approach to balanced electrolytes and minerals. 

 

 

Ref:

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5579607/ 

2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8249833/ 

3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468697/

 

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.